Customer journey guide · Cancellation

Cancellation and exit journey

Cancellation review begins with route finding and ends only when the contract state, billing and confirmation agree. Inventory every method the supplier provides, compare it with entry channels and document why each retained step is reasonably necessary for ending and subscriber interests. Do not reduce section 48F to a slogan such as “one-click cancellation”; apply its enacted scope, standards, online trigger and possible prescribed exceptions.

Explore 6 related practicesOpen all visual examples

Decision map

Decision points to capture

A reliable review preserves the states surrounding the final action. These are the points where information, defaults, price or friction can materially change what a person sees and does.

  1. The account, help or support surface where a subscriber first looks for an ending method.
  2. The transition from information or retention content into an actual ending request.
  3. Every identity, consequence, balance, equipment or timing step required before confirmation.
  4. The final control that submits the request and states the effective ending date.
  5. The post-request state covering billing cessation, access, refunds, data and durable confirmation.

Recognition

Signals worth closer review

A signal is not a legal conclusion. It identifies a state or sequence that deserves evidence-led product and legal review in its complete context.

  • Online or simple entry is paired with an ending route available only by limited-hours telephone contact.
  • Labels and button placement change through repeated save offers or emotional pressure.
  • Closing a retention prompt resets the request or sends the subscriber back to account home.
  • The service collects new marketing information or demands an explanation before allowing completion.
  • A confirmation screen appears without a durable receipt or corresponding contract and billing update.

Fairer design

Principles for a neutral journey

  • Make every supplied ending method easy to find and keep the primary ending action stable through the route.
  • Retain only steps supported by an ending function or a documented subscriber interest.
  • Present optional retention offers once, clearly, without changing or blocking the requested action.
  • Provide an online method when the section 48F(2) trigger applies to the same kind of subscription.
  • State the effective date and consequences, then issue immediate durable confirmation tied to backend state.

Australian legal context

Keep the legal layers separate

Section 48F commences on 1 July 2027 for covered subscription contracts and subscribers. It requires at least one ending method, applies its quality standard to every method the supplier provides and adds an online method on its stated trigger. Regulations may prescribe exceptions. Existing ACL provisions can apply now on their own terms, and current proceedings remain allegations or findings under current law rather than section 48F enforcement. Section 28B overlap also requires its complete separate test.

Read the section 28B guideCheck current enforcement

Practice library

Practices affecting the cancellation journey

The cards below link directly to plain-language definitions, paired fictional interfaces, fairer alternatives, context boundaries and the Australian legal-information layers.

Commences 1 July 2027Obstruction

Cancellation friction

From 1 July 2027, section 48F will require every supplied cancellation method for a covered consumer or small-business subscription to be easy to find, straightforward and limited to reasonably necessary steps. An online method is required where the subscriber entered online or the supplier offers online entry for the same kind of subscription. Section 28B may also apply to obstructed decisions or legal rights.

  • Cancellation

2 visual examples

View examples and legal context
Editorial implementation guidanceInterface interference

Complex or inaccessible language

Complex or inaccessible language is a working label for this design mechanism: Material guidance is presented in a language or level of complexity that makes informed choice materially harder for the target user. This is editorial implementation guidance for Australian journeys, not a finding of unlawfulness. From 1 July 2027, a similar interface is relevant to ACL section 28B only if the complete consumer-connection, manipulation or unreasonable-distortion and actual-or-likely-detriment test is met. Current ACL rules require a separate assessment.

  • Cancellation
  • Checkout

2 visual examples

View examples and legal context
Commences 1 July 2027Interface interference

Confirmshaming and emotional pressure

Confirmshaming is design terminology, not a named offence in the final Act. Loaded language may nevertheless manipulate a consumer or contribute to unreasonable pressure or distortion under section 28B from 1 July 2027, where likely financial or other detriment also exists. Tone alone is not enough; placement, repetition, choice structure and consequence matter.

  • Checkout
  • Cancellation

2 visual examples

View examples and legal context
Editorial implementation guidanceObstruction

Dead end

Dead end is a working label for this design mechanism: A consumer-favourable route cannot reach its represented outcome and instead loops, stalls or loses progress. This is editorial implementation guidance for Australian journeys, not a finding of unlawfulness. From 1 July 2027, a similar interface is relevant to ACL section 28B only if the complete consumer-connection, manipulation or unreasonable-distortion and actual-or-likely-detriment test is met. Current ACL rules require a separate assessment.

  • Account Management
  • Cancellation

2 visual examples

View examples and legal context
Editorial implementation guidanceSneaking

Negative option or unauthorised transaction

Negative option or unauthorised transaction is a working label for this design mechanism: Silence, inactivity or an ineffective prior interaction is treated as authorisation for a paid or consequential transaction. This is editorial implementation guidance for Australian journeys, not a finding of unlawfulness. From 1 July 2027, a similar interface is relevant to ACL section 28B only if the complete consumer-connection, manipulation or unreasonable-distortion and actual-or-likely-detriment test is met. Current ACL rules require a separate assessment.

  • Subscription
  • Cancellation

2 visual examples

View examples and legal context
Editorial implementation guidanceInterface interference

Trick question

Trick question is a working label for this design mechanism: A question or control uses confusing, reversed or leading semantics so the user's likely interpretation may not match the resulting choice. This is editorial implementation guidance for Australian journeys, not a finding of unlawfulness. From 1 July 2027, a similar interface is relevant to ACL section 28B only if the complete consumer-connection, manipulation or unreasonable-distortion and actual-or-likely-detriment test is met. Current ACL rules require a separate assessment.

  • Signup
  • Cancellation

2 visual examples

View examples and legal context

Evidence base

Sources

  1. Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Act 2026Federal Register of Legislation · Primary · checked 2026-09-14 · C2026A00064
  2. Competition and Consumer Act 2010, including Schedule 2: Australian Consumer LawFederal Register of Legislation · Primary · checked 2026-09-14 · C2004A00109
  3. Dark commercial patternsOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development · Secondary · checked 2026-09-14 · OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 336